Recent News
Welcome to Healthish!
- Published 05/25/2007
Featured Articles
Caution: Some soft drinks may seriously harm your health
- By N/A
- Published 05/27/2007
- Diet and Nutrition , Health News
- Unrated
Expert links additive to cell damage
By Martin Hickman, Consumer Affairs Correspondent
Published: 27 May 2007
A new health scare erupted over soft drinks last night amid evidence they may cause serious cell damage. Research from a British university suggests a common preservative found in drinks such as Fanta and Pepsi Max has the ability to switch off vital parts of DNA.
The problem - more usually associated with aging and alcohol abuse - can eventually lead to cirrhosis of the liver and degenerative diseases such as Parkinson's.
The findings could have serious consequences for the hundreds of millions of people worldwide who consume fizzy drinks. They will also intensify the controversy about food additives, which have been linked to hyperactivity in children.
Concerns center on the safety of E211, known as sodium benzoate, a preservative used for decades by the £74bn global carbonated drinks industry. Sodium benzoate derives from benzoic acid. It occurs naturally in berries, but is used in large quantities to prevent mold in soft drinks such as Sprite, Oasis and Dr Pepper. It is also added to pickles and sauces.
Sodium benzoate has already been the subject of concern about cancer because when mixed with the additive vitamin C in soft drinks, it causes benzene, a carcinogenic substance. A Food Standards Agency survey of benzene in drinks last year found high levels in four brands which were removed from sale.
Now, an expert in aging at Sheffield University, who has been working on sodium benzoate since publishing a research paper in 1999, has decided to speak out about another danger. Professor Peter Piper, a professor of molecular biology and biotechnology, tested the impact of sodium benzoate on living yeast cells in his laboratory. What he found alarmed him: the benzoate was damaging an important area of DNA in the "power station" of cells known as the mitochondria.
He told The Independent on Sunday: "These chemicals have the ability to cause severe damage to DNA in the mitochondria to the point that they totally inactivate it: they knock it out altogether.
"The mitochondria consumes the oxygen to give you energy and if you damage it - as happens in a number if diseased states - then the cell starts to malfunction very seriously. And there is a whole array of diseases that are now being tied to damage to this DNA - Parkinson's and quite a lot of neuro-degenerative diseases, but above all the whole process of aging."
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) backs the use of sodium benzoate in the UK and it has been approved by the European Union but last night, MPs called for it to investigate urgently.
Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat chair of Parliament's all-party environment group said: "Many additives are relatively new and their long-term impact cannot be certain. This preservative clearly needs to be investigated further by the FSA."
A review of sodium benzoate by the World Health Organization in 2000 concluded that it was safe, but it noted that the available science supporting its safety was "limited".
Professor Piper, whose work has been funded by a government research
council, said tests conducted by the US Food and Drug Administration
were out of date.
"The food industry will say these compounds have been tested and they are complete safe," he said. "By the criteria of modern safety testing, the safety tests were inadequate. Like all things, safety testing moves forward and you can conduct a much more rigorous safety test than you could 50 years ago."
He advised parents to think carefully about buying drinks with preservatives until the quantities in products were proved safe by new tests. "My concern is for children who are drinking large amounts," he said.
Coca-Cola and Britvic's Pepsi Max and Diet Pepsi all contain sodium benzoate. Their makers and the British Soft Drinks Association said they entrusted the safety of additives to the Government.
Recent Articles
Lumpectomy safe for younger breast cancer patients
- By Health Informer
- Published 05/28/2007
- Breast Cancer
- Unrated
Date updated: May 24, 2007
Content provided by Reuters
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Breast cancer tends to be more aggressive when it occurs in younger women, and doctors often advise radical surgery. Now, however, a study shows that breast-conserving treatment, commonly known as lumpectomy, is safe for women younger than 40.
Acceptable outcomes, "almost comparable to the rates observed among patients older than 40 years, can be obtained if high-quality surgery and radiotherapy are combined with chemotherapy," Dr. Adri C. Voogd from Maastricht University in the Netherlands told Reuters Health.
Voogd and colleagues evaluated the outcomes of 758 women 40 years of age or younger who underwent this course of treatment between 1988 and 2002.
Ninety-five women developed a local recurrence of breast cancer during follow-up, the researchers report in the medical journal Cancer, and an additional 17 women had recurrences diagnosed after the cancer was found to have spread to other sites in the body.
"Of the local recurrences that were identified in our study, the large majority occurred at or near the site of the primary tumor, and only 7% developed elsewhere in the breast," the researchers explain. "This suggests that, at least in young women, most local recurrences are not new primary tumors, but are more likely to be true recurrences, originating from residual tumor tissue."
The team calculates that local recurrence rates were 9% at 5 years and 18% after 10 years.
"With our findings, we hope to have taken away some of the fears and make breast conservation a more acceptable treatment option for young women with breast cancer," Voogd said.
SOURCE: Cancer, May 15, 2007.
TV Can Be Bad For Diabetic Children
- By N/A
- Published 05/26/2007
- Health News
- Unrated
CHICAGO - Diabetic children who spent the most time glued to the TV had a tougher time controlling their blood sugar, according to a Norwegian study that illustrates yet another downside of too much television.The findings, based on a study of children with Type 1 diabetes, lend support to the American Academy of Pediatrics’ advice that children watch no more than two hours of TV daily, said lead author Dr. Hanna Margeirsdottir of the University of Oslo.
Type 1 diabetes is the less common form of the disease and used to be called juvenile diabetes. It is not related to obesity and is caused when the body cannot make insulin, which converts sugar from food into energy. People with Type 1 must take insulin daily and regulate their blood-sugar levels.
Snacking and overeating can increase blood-sugar levels; physical activity can lower them. While TV-viewing is often accompanied by snacking, the researchers didn’t examine diet or physical activity.
The study results “suggest that encouraging children with Type 1 diabetes to watch less television may be important for improved blood glucose control and better health outcomes,” the study authors wrote.
Other experts said the study also might suggest something else. Diabetic children who already have consistently high blood-sugar levels could feel too sick to do much besides watch TV, said Jill Weissburg-Benchell, a psychologist and diabetes educator at Children’s Memorial Hospital in Chicago.
“It’s very clear that there is a relationship. Now the question is what underlies that relationship,” she said.
Results of the Oslo research will appear in the June edition of the journal Diabetes Care.
The study involved 538 children with an average age of 13. In Norway, about 25,000 people have Type 1 diabetes. In the United States, there are 3 million with the condition and about 30 million worldwide.
The study evaluated results of a routine test that measured average blood-sugar control over three months. There was a continuous increase in the level of blood sugar with every hour of TV watched, rising to the highest level for those who watched at least four hours daily.
The results didn’t surprise Chicago diabetes educator Monica Joyce, who founded a basketball camp for diabetic children.
Campers typically are asked how much TV they watch and are taught “they can get much better blood sugars if they’re active,” Joyce said.
If the researchers’ theory is right, then turning off the TV could be added to a list of remedies “that are very low-cost to the health care system,” said Dr. Francine Kaufman, head of a diabetes program at Children’s Hospital in Los Angeles.
“This has got to be the social norm that it’s just not acceptable for kids to be baby-sat by TV,” she said.
© 2007 The Associated Press.